arXiv preprint ·
AI Exposure and AI Resilience: A Two-Dimensional Assessment Framework for Software and Software-Based Business Model
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Navigating AI's Impact on Business Models
This paper introduces the AI Exposure and Resilience (AI-ER) framework, which assesses how businesses can respond to AI pressures and adapt effectively. It provides a structured way to evaluate both the risks and the resilience of software-based business models in the age of AI.
What they found: The AI-ER framework was applied to evaluate companies, resulting in exposure scores averaging 75 and resilience scores averaging 60. The framework allows for a traceable company profile that highlights both strengths and weaknesses in adapting to AI pressures. This structured assessment can guide businesses in strategic planning and resource allocation.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is changing both software production and the economics of software-based business models. Classical technology due diligence mainly examines technical properties such as architecture, scalability, and technical debt. These criteria do not fully capture how AI can affect a company's value proposition, competitive position, margins, or access to customers. This paper develops Artificial Intelligence Exposure and Resilience (AI-ER) as a two-dimensional assessment framework. AI exposure describes the pressure for change that AI creates for a business model. AI resilience describes the company's ability to absorb that pressure, adapt to changed conditions, and use AI in an economically viable way. Metrics for both dimensions are derived from current AI capabilities, their deployment conditions, and relevant research on business models and organizational adaptability. The model keeps exposure and resilience separate and adds an explicit assessment of evidence quality and confidence. It can be applied first with public information and later refined with internal evidence. The result is a traceable company profile that supports comparison without concealing uncertainty in the underlying evidence. The paper also specifies an initial score logic and a procedure for empirical validation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence
Breaking the Token Ceiling: Distilling Smaller, Stronger Byte Models
Evaluating Scaffolding-Oriented Multi-Agent Large Language Model System for Clinical Interview Training
Hybrid Physics-AI Framework of Body Center of Mass Dynamics from Wrist-Worn Sensors
Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis with Incomplete Modalities via Semantic-aware Completeness based Reconstruction
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.