arXiv preprint ·
Debate-to-Skill: Capability-Bound Process Supervision for Industrial Query-to-Agent Annotation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Industrial query-to-agent matching fails when topical relevance is mistaken for executable capability, especially on long-tail and boundary-sensitive requests. We formulate annotation as \emph{capability-bound process supervision} and instantiate it with Debate-to-Skill, which uses reusable decision principles, structured deliberation, verifier-based verdict extraction, and disagreement-driven refinement. On an industrial Query2Agent benchmark, we compare Debate-to-Skill with direct-label supervision, reasoning-SFT, and structural ablations. The results test whether gains come from supervising the capability-critical decision process itself, especially on grey-zone cases where semantic relatedness and executable capability diverge.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence
Breaking the Token Ceiling: Distilling Smaller, Stronger Byte Models
Evaluating Scaffolding-Oriented Multi-Agent Large Language Model System for Clinical Interview Training
Hybrid Physics-AI Framework of Body Center of Mass Dynamics from Wrist-Worn Sensors
Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis with Incomplete Modalities via Semantic-aware Completeness based Reconstruction
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.