arXiv preprint ·
A Later Test Set Is Not a New Domain: Pretraining Familiarity Survives a Contamination-Free Hold-Out
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Timing is Everything in Time-Series Forecasting
This paper introduces a novel testing protocol that uses datasets published after model release, revealing that pretrained models perform better when they are familiar with the domain. It challenges the assumption that a hold-out set is a true test of a model's capabilities.
What they found: The study found that pretrained models excelled in familiar domains, achieving a 28% lower MASE on Wikipedia pageviews compared to classical methods. In a direct comparison, the TimesFM family outperformed the Chronos family, indicating that familiarity with the training corpus significantly influences forecasting accuracy. The results suggest that benchmarks should reflect domain familiarity to provide a clearer picture of model performance.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Time-series foundation models are evaluated almost exclusively on public archives that predate them, so a strong score cannot be separated from having seen the test set during pretraining. The obvious remedy is a hold-out that postdates the models. We build one: thirteen forecasters -- four classical, three trained per dataset, six pretrained -- on seven groups drawn from five domains, every observation published after the last model was released, and every dataset rebuildable without an API key. Under this protocol pretrained models win 5 of 7 groups, lose one to a Theta baseline, and on daily exchange rates are indistinguishable from a seasonal naive forecast, along with every other method tested. We then ask what separates the wins from the losses, and report a negative result: the two intrinsic properties one would reach for -- seasonal strength and spectral entropy, measured on the input window -- do not account for the pattern, and seasonal strength is if anything negatively associated with the advantage. What does track it is corpus familiarity. Our largest gain (28% lower MASE than the best classical method, on weekly Wikipedia pageviews) falls on Wikipedia pageviews, the domain TimesFM's authors describe as the bulk of its pretraining corpus, at the same granularities and differing only in time window. Within the pretrained family, where every model forecasts identical series so that series difficulty cancels, the TimesFM family outranks the Chronos family by -0.53 ranks on Wikipedia against -0.09 everywhere else (1,500 vs. 754 series, Mann-Whitney p < 1e-5). We conclude that a temporal hold-out removes memorisation of a window but not familiarity with a domain, that benchmarks therefore need domain hold-outs stated relative to disclosed corpora, and that the practitioner's question is less which model is better than whether their domain is one the model was raised on.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
A Statistical Approach to Estimating Sample Size of Machine Learning Models
ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations
TEFM: Token-Efficient Faithful Modeling for Structured Data
Structurally Speaking: Motif-Oriented Graph Captioning through Bidirectional Graph-Text Translation
High-probability guarantees for linear accessibility in feature superposition
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.