arXiv preprint ·
Uncertainty-Aware Sea-Ice Type Mapping with Multiple Ice Charts
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Sea-ice stage of development (SoD) describes the age and associated thickness of sea ice and provides important information for navigation, and operational ice monitoring. SoD labels are obtained from operational ice charts, where trained analysts interpret satellite observations and assign standardized stage codes to regions with similar ice conditions. These codes often represent ranges of compatible ice thicknesses rather than exact physical values. Deep-learning methods can automate SoD mapping and commonly adopt operational ice charts as reference labels for training. These annotations are not exact, however; this is because chart interpretation relies on analyst judgement and on the observations available at the time, so different ice services may assign different SoD labels to the same conditions. We term this variation across independently produced expert annotations multi-annotator label uncertainty; collapsing the annotations into a single deterministic target discards this variation. A second source of uncertainty originates in the learned model itself. In this paper, we quantify both sources: annotation uncertainty from disagreement among independent ice-service charts and model uncertainty from the learned predictive models. We then evaluate their relationship by testing whether model uncertainty is higher where ice services disagree. We observe that supervision incorporating information from multiple annotators can improve this correspondence, with soft supervision achieving the highest overall correlation of 0.256. The relationship becomes substantially stronger near the ice edge, where model predictive uncertainty closely tracks multi-annotator disagreement, reaching a correlation of 0.704 within 0--10 km. Among the uncertainty-estimation approaches, Monte Carlo dropout provides the best-calibrated confidence estimates, with an expected calibration error of 0.050.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Risk-Conditioned Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
A Statistical Approach to Estimating Sample Size of Machine Learning Models
A Gradient-based yet Spike-Timing-Dependent Solution to the Feedback Learning Problem in Neural Microcircuits
TEFM: Token-Efficient Faithful Modeling for Structured Data
A Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Restaurant Food Waste to Support Sustainable Food Management
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.