arXiv preprint ·
A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing RPA Opportunities in Healthcare Processes
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Streamlining RPA in Healthcare
This paper introduces a four-module, data-driven framework that helps hospitals systematically select and prioritize RPA opportunities, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively and financial returns are forecasted before implementation.
What they found: The framework effectively identifies and prioritizes RPA opportunities, with 60% of evaluated processes clearing the prioritization threshold. It demonstrates strong stability in rankings, even with weight perturbations, and highlights critical risks in four processes. Additionally, the budget analysis reveals that increasing investment leads to diminishing returns, providing valuable insights for financial planning.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is widely used to reduce administrative burden in United States hospitals, yet an estimated 30-50% of RPA initiatives underperform because processes are selected informally, without a repeatable method to catalogue candidates, prioritize them, match each to an automation tier -- a Python bot, an open-source orchestrator such as n8n, or an enterprise platform such as UiPath -- and forecast financial return before committing resources. We propose a four-module, data-driven framework unifying these decisions: a Process Taxonomy of twenty recurring hospital processes across five value streams; a Prioritization module deriving an Automation Suitability Index from an Analytic Hierarchy Process matrix with an explicit consistency check; a Tool-Tier Selection module recommending the least-cost technology sufficient for a process complexity, integration, and compliance profile; and a Return-on-Investment module quantifying labor savings, error-cost avoidance, payback, and net present value. Applied to a synthetic portfolio spanning all twenty processes, plus a reference data-flow architecture linking it to hospital EHR/payer/ERP systems: 12 of 20 clear the prioritization threshold; the ranking is robust to +/-20% weight perturbation (Spearman correlation 0.83, top-5 set preserved 97.7%, 2,000 Monte Carlo trials); an Automation Risk Index flags four qualifying processes as Critical risk; a budget-constrained portfolio optimization shows diminishing marginal NPV as spend scales from $400K to $1.03M; and a second Monte Carlo analysis shows portfolio NPV stays positive at its 5th percentile. The framework is a conceptual synthesis of the literature rather than an instrument calibrated on primary hospital data; we discuss HIPAA governance and a research agenda for empirical validation. A supplementary Python implementation accompanies the paper.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating
An Efficient and Effective Agentic Group Shilling Attack on Recommender Systems
Vectorizer: Vectorizing NumPy Programs with Shape-Guided Rewrite
TEFM: Token-Efficient Faithful Modeling for Structured Data
SchemeArena: Factorized Stress Testing of Scheming in LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.