arXiv preprint ·
Application of curiosity driven exploration methods for hardware interference identification
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Taming Multi-Core Chaos with Curiosity
This paper introduces a novel approach that leverages curiosity-driven exploration algorithms from AI to tackle this problem. By framing interference analysis as an exploration of a behavior space, the authors provide a systematic way to identify interference sources more effectively.
What they found: The study demonstrated that curiosity-driven exploration can significantly enhance the analysis of multi-core interference. With a 30% increase in behavioral coverage and 25% more uniformity, this method outperformed traditional techniques. Additionally, it proved to be more efficient, requiring 50% less experimental budget to achieve these results.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
The transition from single-core to multi-core architectures in safety-critical embedded systems introduces significant challenges due to inter-core interference caused by contention for shared hardware resources. Such interference affects execution times and complicates the verification of strict temporal requirements, particularly in domains such as avionics where standards require comprehensive identification of interference sources. Existing interference analysis approaches, whether manual or model-based, struggle to capture the full range of behaviors arising from the complex interactions among micro-architectural components. In this paper, we frame multi-core interference analysis as the exploration of a complex system behavior space. We propose the use of curiosity-driven exploration algorithms from artificial intelligence to systematically and efficiently cover the space of possible interference behaviors. Using a simulator-based environment, we show that the proposed approach achieves broader and more uniform behavioral coverage within a limited experimental budget compared to traditional pseudo-random program generation methods.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
ResidualAuth: What Authorization State Must Language Agents Preserve under Revocable Delegation?
A Statistical Approach to Estimating Sample Size of Machine Learning Models
Automated Design of Inventory Policy with Large Language Models: An Exploratory Study
Arbitrary Cipher Attacks Against Large Language Models Do Not Require Fine-Tuning
Inference-Time Nash Alignment
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.