arXiv preprint ·
Structural Jailbreaks Generalize but Do Not Compound: A cross-provider and multilingual study of Involuntary In-Context Learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Aligned language models fail under two independent pressures: the structural jailbreak class recently formalized as Involuntary In-Context Learning (IICL), which reframes a harmful request as the final missing cell of a data-labeling task completed by pattern rather than judged as content; and the erosion of safety alignment outside English. A natural hypothesis is that these compound. We test it directly. Using a deterministic IICL operator and a StrongREJECT-style rubric judge, we red-team two Google Gemini models on two benchmarks, a 30 general-harm behaviours from HarmBench and 30 financial-abuse behaviours from FinProof, each under a single-shot baseline and under IICL in four languages (English, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic). First, IICL generalizes to a second provider and is worse in finance: it lifts attack success from <=6.7% to 80-90% on HarmBench and 97-100% on FinProof, an order of magnitude above the <=24% its introducing study reported on OpenAI's GPT-5.4. Second, against the hypothesis, forcing the IICL output into a non-English language does not stack the two weaknesses, it attenuates the attack. Eleven of twelve non-English conditions score below their English baseline (sign test, p~0.003), the lone exception a ceiling tie near 100%; on the stronger model's financial set Arabic collapses from 100% to 33%. We attribute this to a relevance curse: once structure has unlocked compliance, the models produce lower-quality harmful content in lower-resource languages, which a substance-grading judge scores as partial. The pattern replicates under an independent non-Google judge (Cohen's kappa=0.86, 377 paired verdicts), and 76.6% of non-English responses were verified in-language. Jailbreak vulnerabilities are therefore not additive; the dominant residual risk is the English structural attack, most acute for financial abuse, not a multilingual one.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
ResidualAuth: What Authorization State Must Language Agents Preserve under Revocable Delegation?
An Efficient and Effective Agentic Group Shilling Attack on Recommender Systems
DRIFT: Removing Diffusion Watermarks by Deflecting the Generative Trajectory
Arbitrary Cipher Attacks Against Large Language Models Do Not Require Fine-Tuning
ACEA: An Adversarial Co-Evolution Arena for Head-to-Head Red-Team and Blue-Team LLM Testing
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.