arXiv preprint ·
Agentic ML Exploration (A-MLE) for Ads Ranking
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Modern industrial ads ranking stacks are increasingly bottlenecked not by model capacity or training compute, but by the throughput of human ML iteration - the cycles of research, implementation, training, debugging, evaluation, and launch required to surface a single statistically significant improvement. A typical ranking stack contains numerous differentiated models with heterogeneous data, architectures, and infrastructure constraints, and each cycle takes days to weeks of senior engineer attention per model. As a result, techniques that have proven effective on one model diffuse into others slowly and unevenly, leaving substantial recoverable signal unexplored. We present Agentic ML Exploration (A-MLE), an autonomous LLM-agent system that systematically explores ML techniques across a portfolio of ads ranking models. A-MLE decomposes ML iteration into five stages involving hypothesis generation, exploration strategy, experiment execution, result analysis and shared knowledge substrate which are orchestrated by a single agent that invokes domain-specific skills and agentic workflows against a sandboxed execution layer, with human-in-the-loop checkpoints at each stage boundary. We deploy A-MLE across a representative set of large-scale ads ranking models and evaluate it along a tiered capability framework (tool availability, autonomous workflow execution, and open-ended exploration). We further report a controlled cross-LLM study using a fixed agent loop, which surfaces qualitative differences in execution reliability and exploration aggressiveness across the Claude Sonnet, Gemini, and GPT families. We discuss failure modes and the design choices that govern reliability. Our findings suggest that agentic exploration is a practical force multiplier for ML engineers in industrial recommenders, especially for the long tail of models that rarely receive expert attention.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
ResidualAuth: What Authorization State Must Language Agents Preserve under Revocable Delegation?
A Statistical Approach to Estimating Sample Size of Machine Learning Models
Automated Design of Inventory Policy with Large Language Models: An Exploratory Study
Arbitrary Cipher Attacks Against Large Language Models Do Not Require Fine-Tuning
Inference-Time Nash Alignment
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.