arXiv preprint ·
OntologyBench: Can Dense Retrieval Satisfy Structured Biomedical Constraints?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We introduce OntologyBench, a tiered biomedical retrieval benchmark comprising 471,854 training and 125,744 evaluation query-document relevance pairs across concept grounding, relational retrieval, and compositional phenotype-based retrieval. Although these tasks can be tractable using ontology-aware reference methods, across task tiers, embedding performance is generally lower on relational and compositional tasks than on concept-grounding tasks. Fine-tuning on ontology-derived supervision improves performance on several relational and compositional tasks, whereas the evaluated reranking and LLM-based candidate-scoring methods provide little or no end-to-end improvement. Errors frequently reflect diseases matching only subsets of the phenotype evidence. These findings indicate that the evaluated embedding and reranking configurations do not reliably recover the compatibility encoded by the selected ontology relations and phenotype combinations and motivate retrieval systems that better integrate learned representations with structured biomedical knowledge.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
ResidualAuth: What Authorization State Must Language Agents Preserve under Revocable Delegation?
A Statistical Approach to Estimating Sample Size of Machine Learning Models
Automated Design of Inventory Policy with Large Language Models: An Exploratory Study
Arbitrary Cipher Attacks Against Large Language Models Do Not Require Fine-Tuning
Inference-Time Nash Alignment
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.