arXiv preprint ·
IGT @ FinMMEval 2026 Task 2: Question-Type Prompting with Targeted Extraction for Multilingual Financial QA
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Unlocking Multilingual Financial Insights
This paper introduces the IGT system, designed specifically for the PolyFiQA Task 2, which employs targeted extraction techniques tailored to the nature of the questions. By leveraging a dual approach, it significantly enhances the accuracy of financial question answering across multiple languages.
What they found: The IGT system achieved a development ROUGE-1 score of approximately 0.395, marking a 60% improvement over a generic RAG baseline of 0.247. It ranked 3rd among 12 teams in the official test set with a ROUGE-1 of 0.3071, demonstrating its effectiveness in multilingual financial question answering. Additionally, the system recorded a Precision of 0.2821 and Recall of 0.4044, indicating a balanced performance across metrics.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
We present the IGT system for PolyFiQA Task 2 of the FinMMEval Lab at CLEF 2026, a multilingual financial question answering task over English SEC filings and multilingual news articles (English, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Greek) for four companies. Our central observation is that the 344 development questions divide into two families requiring fundamentally different approaches: structured numeric types (R&D ratio, cash flow, capital expenditure) are best answered by direct keyword extraction on filing text, while synthesis types (investment strategy, capital allocation, top-three revenue focuses) require rule-based multilingual news passage selection. A dataset analysis reveals that 17-18 of 19 ground-truth reference answers per synthesis type share an exact evidence label prefix, whose unigram tokens contribute directly to ROUGE-1 overlap. The final system achieves development ROUGE-1 approximately 0.395, a 60% relative improvement over a generic RAG baseline (approximately 0.247), and ranks 3rd of 12 teams on the official test set with ROUGE-1 = 0.3071, Precision = 0.2821, and Recall = 0.4044.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating
An Efficient and Effective Agentic Group Shilling Attack on Recommender Systems
Vectorizer: Vectorizing NumPy Programs with Shape-Guided Rewrite
TEFM: Token-Efficient Faithful Modeling for Structured Data
SchemeArena: Factorized Stress Testing of Scheming in LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.