arXiv preprint ·
Pre-game paired-comparison modeling of professional League of Legends map outcomes
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Winning Predictions for League of Legends
This study introduces a novel pre-game win-probability forecaster that combines historical performance metrics with advanced statistical techniques. By integrating team strength and draft variables, the model aims to provide a more accurate and stable prediction framework.
What they found: The study evaluated over 5,135 games across various leagues and events, finding that the proposed logistic regression model performs comparably to a more complex two-stage model. Both models significantly outperformed classical benchmarks, with the dynamic logistic regression achieving a log-loss of 0.2230. Additionally, the forecasts were statistically indistinguishable from market predictions, showcasing their practical applicability in esports betting.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
We build and evaluate a pre-game win-probability forecaster for individual maps (``games'') in professional \emph{League of Legends} (LoL). The proposed model is a one-stage logistic regression fit end-to-end on the win/loss log-loss: each team's exponentially-weighted moving average of past same-side results, a ridge-shrunk stable strength that is the maximum-a-posteriori estimate of a logistic mixed model, and a first-pick draft covariate, natively calibrated out of sample (walk-forward slope $0.995$). It augments a purely dynamic Bradley--Terry specification with stable team strengths. A second, independently built two-stage composite mixed model under restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) shrinkage, with Platt calibration, serves as the strongest rival the authors could build. On $5{,}135$ games across six regional leagues and three international events (2024--2026), under paired per-game Diebold--Mariano inference, the two architectures are statistically indistinguishable on every protocol and window (global holdout $0.2230$ vs.\ $0.2257$; walk-forward $0.2207$ vs.\ $0.2215$), so the simpler model is preferred on parsimony, not accuracy; both improve on the classical dynamic benchmark ($0.2351$) by a clear margin and on the static fits ($0.2301$/$0.2268$) more modestly. Against Polymarket on $928$ matched maps, the forecasts are statistically indistinguishable from the market on its own per-game contracts, with a modest market edge concentrated on cross-region Worlds and series-decider maps.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Applications
Filtering without recursion and some of its uses in financial economics
Nyström Attention Matches Full Attention for Cross-Sectional Stock Prediction
Regimes in the Order Flow
The Log S-fBM model: Statistical analysis
The Elliptically Optimal Confidence Interval: A Bivariate Extension of Wilson's Score Method
Get the few papers worth your time in Applications every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.