arXiv preprint ·
Automated Chest CT Protocol Selection via Large Language Model Derived Text Embeddings from Imaging Request Text
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Accurate CT protocol selection is critical for diagnostic quality and patient safety, yet the current process is manual, time-consuming, and prone to inconsistencies. Prior Machine Learning methods using keywords or bag-of-words lack contextual understanding and perform poorly on rare protocols. We propose a decision support system using large language model (LLM) features to recommend protocols from free-text clinical indications, capturing clinical nuance and phrasing variation for more consistent, efficient selection. Methods: In this REB-approved retrospective study, 285,123 chest CT imaging requests from a large academic medical center (2017-2024) were split into training (228,099, 80%) and held-out test (57,024, 20%) sets. Each request included procedure names, clinical indication, HIS comments, and the selected protocol. Clinical text was embedded using a fine-tuned LLM, Meta's LLaMA-3.1-70B; these features input a logistic regression classifier predicting 18 protocol labels (e.g., PE, LDCT). Results: The pipeline achieved a weighted precision of 0.84, weighted F1-score of 0.81, and overall accuracy of 79% across 18 CT protocols. On 300 independent cases with expert consensus, the LLM reached an overall accuracy of 80% versus 83% for radiologists, with no significant difference (p = 0.263). Performance was comparable across most classes, with the LLM exceeding radiologists for some challenging categories, and entropy analyses indicated more balanced protocol use, suggesting reduced variability. Conclusion: An LLM-based recommendation system can leverage general knowledge from a large natural-text corpus to accurately assign chest CT protocols from free-text imaging requests, and may serve as a viable foundation for protocol recommendation tools where inputs require language understanding.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Risk-Conditioned Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Learning Adaptive SED for heterogeneous load balancing
A Gradient-based yet Spike-Timing-Dependent Solution to the Feedback Learning Problem in Neural Microcircuits
Noisy-Space Policy Gradient for Diffusion Policies in Offline Reinforcement Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.