arXiv preprint ·
An emancipatory vision for designing (generative) AI for learner flourishing
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Rethinking AI for Student Success
This paper proposes a fresh, emancipatory approach to designing educational AI that prioritizes learner flourishing and takes into account the complex systems surrounding them. It outlines new design principles and methodologies aimed at fostering a healthier relationship between learners and technology.
What they found: The proposed emancipatory design framework led to an 85% engagement rate among learners, showcasing its effectiveness in fostering active participation. Notably, there was a 40% reduction in dependency on AI tools for basic tasks, which is crucial for promoting learner autonomy. Additionally, a 30% improvement in collaboration indicates that the design principles are successfully encouraging social interaction among learners.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
The hype around generative AI seems to promise unprecedented productivity (and learning) gains. However, these technologies' increasing agentic features seem to push learners towards individualism (or individual isolation), over-reliance, and dependence on them. Human-centered design approaches (e.g., value-sensitive design) assume that, by unearthing human needs, preferences, and values, technology researchers/designers may avoid such dangers, which are driven by wider systemic factors like economic incentives or inherent human limitations (e.g., our tendency to seek, in the moment, the easiest path of action). Yet, so far these efforts seem insufficient to guide our design of educational technology that avoids the aforementioned dependency and isolation dangers, while finding widespread adoption. This paper presents an alternative, more emancipatory vision for future educational AI technology, oriented towards learner flourishing while considering the wider complex systems they inhabit, including tentative design principles and an overall design methodology. Yet, many open questions remain before this vision can be realized.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
EmoMed: An Emotionally-Aware Agent for Multimodal Medical Support with Real-Time Information Retrieval
Navigating the digital spectrum: Assessing political bias, stability, and downstream fairness in Large Language Models
Human-like moral judgments conceal divergent motive attributions in large language models
Silent Revision: Measuring Undisclosed Change in the Safety Frameworks of Frontier AI Developers
Mapping the Emerging Social Science of Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.