arXiv preprint ·
Where Should Language Sit in a Multimodal Model? Lessons from What Language Does to Human Perception and Cognition
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Language models compute over tokens: language is their input, their output, and increasingly their internal representation. Whether language should keep all of these positions depends on what language does to the system that uses it. The one system with a century of data on that question is the human. We review what language does to human perception, the brain, and thought, and read the same evidence against multimodal models and language models. Throughout, we treat language as a compressor that runs on a shared codebook: a word is an index, the content is in the receiver, and a community maintains the codebook. In humans the compression is measurable, learning the codebook reorganizes the senses, and thought survives the loss of language. We then measure the rule that models apply when two cues disagree, with cue-conflict experiments on six vision-language models and two robot policies. Surviving cues are weighted in the order their reliabilities prescribe, at 11 to 82\% of the ideal observer's slope, and many answers copy the text. One policy family drops a cue that adds no information beyond the others rather than down-weighting it, another keeps it at a weight that fails when the cues conflict, and a visual cue that identifies the task in every training frame is never learned, because the language pathway already fits the data. Language models are the best current models of the human language network, and they have entered the human speech community, shifting word frequencies while alignment narrows their conceptual diversity. We close with seven implications for token-based systems. Language belongs at a model's boundary and in the shared codebook, as in the brain, not as its internal representation; the price of leaving the codebook inside is auditability.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating
Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation
Vectorizer: Vectorizing NumPy Programs with Shape-Guided Rewrite
Dynamic-Programming-Guided Hierarchical BPE and Empirical Analysis of Vocabulary Pruning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.