arXiv preprint ·
HyperTransfer: Understanding the Equivalence between Base Optimizer and Hyperball
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Hyperball optimizers constrain parameter norms and update only their directions, establishing a distinct paradigm for neural network optimization. Although this geometry appears fundamentally different from that of conventional Base Optimizers, which update both parameter norms and directions, we show that the two paradigms are dynamically equivalent for scale-invariant networks. Building on this equivalence, we propose HyperTransfer, which constructs a Hyperball optimizer that reproduces the dynamics of a target Base Optimizer using only its initialization and learning-rate schedule, without running the target optimizer itself. We further derive the inverse mapping and extend the framework to non-scale-invariant networks. Experiments show that both HyperTransfer and the inverse mapping produce loss trajectories nearly identical to those of their targets, suggesting that Hyperball dynamics are governed primarily by the induced effective learning-rate schedule and optimizer state.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Risk-Conditioned Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Learning Adaptive SED for heterogeneous load balancing
A Gradient-based yet Spike-Timing-Dependent Solution to the Feedback Learning Problem in Neural Microcircuits
Noisy-Space Policy Gradient for Diffusion Policies in Offline Reinforcement Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.