arXiv preprint ·

Query-Oblivious Coresets for Softmax Attention: Improved Bounds and Efficient Constructions

Ofek I. Cohen

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Data Structures & AlgorithmsComputation & Language / NLP

Abstract

A query-oblivious coreset for a softmax-attention head is a subset $S$ of the key--value pairs such that attention computed from $S$ alone is within $\varepsilon$ of the full output, in $\ell_2$, simultaneously for every query in a ball. Liberty, Andoni and Kleiner proved that unweighted coresets of size $O(\sqrt d\,e^{ρ+\frac12\logρ+o(\log\logρ)}/\varepsilon)$ exist, $ρ$ being the query radius times the centred key radius, against a lower bound $Ω(\sqrt d\,e^ρ/\varepsilon)$, and conjectured that closing the gap needs new techniques. We show it does not. A spherical lift of both balls into one exponential-kernel instance lets the chaining bound of Bozzai and Rothvoss apply directly, and Chevet's inequality splits key from value dimension: unweighted coresets of size $O(e^ρ(\sqrt{d_v}+\sqrt{d_k\log(1+ρ)})/\varepsilon)$ exist and are computable in randomised polynomial time, the first with a whole-ball guarantee at the existential size up to $\sqrt{\log(1+ρ)}$. A dimension-free sampling cap $O(e^{2ρ}/\varepsilon^{2})$ completes the envelope. In fixed dimension the logarithm disappears: completing the key ball to a sphere makes the kernel an unweighted Gaussian one, so Tai's diameter-free bound gives $O_{d_k,d_v}(e^ρ/\varepsilon)$, ruling out a matching logarithmic lower bound there and answering the Gaussian-restriction case of a question of Bozzai and Rothvoss for the exponential and Hellinger kernels. We restate the Liberty--Andoni--Kleiner bound in the centred convention with a full proof, and show that the one-way communication bounds of Chen et al.\ transfer to query-oblivious coresets, where for $\varepsilon\ll e^{-ρ}$ they are the strongest floors known. The dimensional factor is the price of one signing for all queries: for a single query the discrepancy is $O(e^ρ)$, dimension-free.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Data Structures & Algorithms

Get the few papers worth your time in Data Structures & Algorithms every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics