arXiv preprint ·
A Comparative Study of GAN-Based Deep Learning Models for Pneumonia Detection in Chest X-Rays
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
This study evaluates pneumonia classification in chest X-rays using VGG19, MobileNetV2, ResNet50, and a custom CNN, and explores Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based synthetic data augmentation. MobileNetV2 achieved the highest reported accuracy of 88% with balanced class-wise performance. The custom CNN achieved pneumonia recall of 92.67% and precision of 79.43%, highlighting a precision-recall trade-off. Accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall, confusion matrices, and training curves were used to assess performance. Synthetic pneumonia images were combined with real images to investigate whether augmentation could improve classification performance. In the reported VGG19 comparison, augmented-data training accuracy reached approximately 100%, while validation accuracy remained near 50%, below the real-data validation accuracy. This experiment therefore did not demonstrate a validation-performance benefit from GAN augmentation. The classifier comparison highlights differences in accuracy and pneumonia recall, while the augmentation experiment indicates the need for further evaluation of synthetic-image quality and training settings.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Closed-Loop Evaluation of Bird's-Eye-View Maps from Cross-View Transformers as Inputs to Behavior-Cloning Policies
Deep learning from the crowd Fundamentals of morphological galaxy classification
MolParser-Mobile: Ultrafast OCSR System for Large-Scale Chemical Literature Mining
One Shared LoRA Weight for MRI Reconstruction across Acceleration Factors
CoRe-SAM3: Conditional Semantic--Visual Reconciliation for SAM3 Crack Segmentation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.