arXiv preprint ·
Don't Lose Entities from Retrieval to Generation: Dual Entity Recovery RAG for multi-hop QA
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented multi-hop question answering (QA) decomposes a query into sub-questions and decomposes the corpus into smaller retrieval units such as sentences. Both forms of decomposition improve the pipeline, but we show that both share the same vulnerability, the loss of entity information, and that this loss breaks the pipeline at two separate points. The first point is retrieval, where a sub-question loses the entity resolved at the previous hop, leaving the retriever with nothing to match against. The second point is harder to see, because retrieval still appears to succeed. Once a passage is split into sentences, an isolated sentence loses the context that grounds its pronouns, so even with the correct sentence in hand the LLM cannot tell which entity the sentence is about. We isolate this second point as a distinct failure mode that we call lost-in-generation, and a retrieval-controlled experiment shows that it degrades answers even when the gold evidence is fixed in the context. We then propose Dual Entity Recovery RAG (DER-RAG), which keeps the grounding entity explicit from retrieval through to generation with two lightweight components, a two-way query decomposition that carries the resolved entity across sub-questions and a subject entity prefix attached to each sentence at generation time. DER-RAG needs no graph construction, no corpus modification, and no fine-tuning, yet on three multi-hop QA benchmarks it matches or exceeds strong baselines, including graph-based methods that depend on costly offline structures.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Bait-and-Recover: Poisoning Internal Refusal Signals to Defend LLMs against White-Box Editing Jailbreaks
Reliability, validity, and diagnostic evidence for multi-model LLM short-answer scoring
Recall Is Not Protection: Evaluating Safety Monitors Against Model Compliance
FrankenReport: Early Exiting in Long-Form Generation Using Expected Value of Computation
Dynamic Lagging for Simultaneous Translation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.