arXiv preprint ·
SkillSpec: Intent-Masked Specification Reasoning for Agent Skill Correctness
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Autonomous agent systems increasingly depend on reusable skill abstractions for consolidating experiential knowledge and domain expertise. These artifacts typically bundle free-form instructions with heterogeneous resources. However, ensuring their correctness remains challenging. Their failure modes transcend conventional code defects to subtle semantic inconsistencies such as intent conflicts, which manifest as silent failures masked by the underlying model. Moreover, skill correctness must be grounded in intended task boundaries and generalizability. We propose SkillSpec, a Hoare-style framework that formulates skill correctness as a specification reasoning problem. It transforms a heterogeneous skill repository into a unified graph representation that aligns descriptions, instructions and code artifacts. For each node, SkillSpec derives an ExpectSpec from the surrounding declared intent, and infers FactSpecs from encoded behavior under partially disclosed intent. An intent mask regulates access to holistic, lineage, neighborhood, and local views to balance the bias introduced by excessive context against unsupported inference caused by insufficient context. SkillSpec jointly reasons over these views to flag candidate defects, and automatically validates them in an isolated sandbox. On 515 real-world skills from SkillsBench and widely downloaded repositories, SkillSpec identified 763 manually confirmed defects across 239 skills, achieving 61.2% precision. The node-level analysis across multiple model families shows that specification reasoning is consistently reliable for code nodes, whereas plain-text nodes remain a major bottleneck. Most defects arise at the boundaries between declared intent and implementation, demonstrating that explicit specifications provide a practical foundation for skill quality assurance in real-world agent ecosystems.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Diffs vs. Whole Files: An Empirical Comparison of Iterative Edit-Based and Direct Generation for Flutter/Dart Code Models
From Reading Code to Reading Spec: A Verified Layer for LLM-Driven Codebase Maintenance
Broken on Arrival: Silently Defective LLM Artifacts in Public Model Registries and How to Catch Them
A Unified Policy Architecture (UPA): The Governance Kernel for Enterprise AI Operating Systems
CAROL: Context-Aware Online Learning for Fuzzer Scheduling
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.