arXiv preprint ·
Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Peer review is central to quality control in science. However, existing evaluations of AI-assisted peer review mainly focus on the overall quality of generated reviews or the accuracy of final decisions. They therefore provide limited evidence about whether model decisions are supported by sufficient and reliable review evidence. We introduce a process-centric diagnostic benchmark for AI-assisted peer review. It uses (x,$z_s$,$z_c$,$z_r$,y) to represent the paper content, summary, critique, suggestion, and decision. We convert heterogeneous review records from PeerRead, NLPeer ARR-22, and OpenReview-ICLR into process-aligned data. Our benchmark uses direct decision prediction from the paper content (Direct) as its baseline. It compares the decision value of Gold-process variables and Predicted-process variables, and conducts stage-level evaluation, chain-consistency evaluation, and interventional sensitivity analysis. Experiments across three datasets and six models show that Gold-process variables generally have higher decision value. For the main analysis model, the Gold--Predicted gap remains stable across datasets and random seeds. This gap is also reproduced in most model--dataset combinations. Although model-generated intermediate review texts show relatively high local consistency across adjacent stages, the final decisions are not consistently supported by the preceding review evidence. Our benchmark targets AI systems designed to assist rather than replace human reviewers. It provides a transparent and auditable diagnostic tool for evaluating the reliability of their review processes.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Diffs vs. Whole Files: An Empirical Comparison of Iterative Edit-Based and Direct Generation for Flutter/Dart Code Models
Linear Algebra Foundations of Efficient Attention: A Phase Reversal in Rank Collapse Under SVD Compression
Distilling Vision-Language Models for On-Device Fire Understanding
AGSA-Net: Abundance-Guided Self-Attention Network for Spectral Unmixing-Aware Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification
Closed-Loop Evaluation of Bird's-Eye-View Maps from Cross-View Transformers as Inputs to Behavior-Cloning Policies
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.