arXiv preprint ·
A budget-dependent crossover between coverage- and response-based training-set selection for machine-learned interatomic potentials
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Selecting compact training sets for machine-learned interatomic potentials requires deciding whether to preserve structural diversity or target configurations on which models disagree. The better choice can depend on how much data is retained, making a comparison at one training-set size insufficient. Here we link selection criteria to prediction accuracy through a budget-resolved comparison of retrained MACE models on GAP-20 Carbon and pooled revised MD17. Structural coverage is compared with a response-guided selector that targets disagreement between a coverage-trained model and a full-data reference. This retrospective response witness tests the value of model disagreement for compressing an already labelled pool. At 5\%, coverage gives smaller absolute deviations from the full-data error than random sampling across four force endpoints in both datasets. The witness has larger deviations than coverage at 1\% and 5\%, but the ordering reverses at 20\%. At 20\%, witness-selected models also lower direct held-out force errors by 0.46--5.89\% relative to coverage, with all eight paired training-seed intervals favouring the witness. Six errors fall below the full-data reference. Mean force-error reductions are 0.164--0.167~meV~$\textÅ^{-1}$, with larger gains for tail and masked endpoints. Complementary analyses show that learned similarity preserves the coverage ranking, while selecting by frozen-model error gives higher error than embedding coverage. These findings establish retained-data budget as a deciding variable in atomistic training-set selection and provide a direct test of when response-guided compression improves on structural coverage.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Nonlinear elliptic homogenization with the parametric Deep Ritz method
Deep learning from the crowd Fundamentals of morphological galaxy classification
Diagonal Attenuation: A Finite-Sample Correction for PCA
One Shared LoRA Weight for MRI Reconstruction across Acceleration Factors
Physical policy gradient theorem for in situ stochastic-adjoint training
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.