arXiv preprint ·
Exposing Weaknesses in Emotion Recognition in Conversations
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Emotion Recognition in Conversations (ERC) aims to identify speakers' emotions in multi-turn dialogue. Accurate emotion recognition can support a wide range of applications, including empathetic conversational agents, mental health support, and educational technologies. While many recent approaches rely on task-specific fine-tuning, such models may exploit dataset-specific cues. A central yet rarely questioned assumption in ERC is that each utterance can be assigned a single unambiguous emotion label. To investigate this assumption, we study ERC using Large Language Models (LLMs) in a zero-shot setting while incorporating preceding conversational turns as context. We show that aggregate metrics mask systematic failures. Errors concentrate around utterances containing negations, exclamations, and interjections. This pattern is consistent across all evaluated models, suggesting limitations in the benchmarks rather than model-specific weaknesses. A controlled re-annotation study involving four human annotators supports this finding: strong agreement is observed in only 35 percent of cases, with neutral utterances dominating high-agreement instances, while many emotional categories fall into low-agreement regimes. These findings suggest that many apparent model errors reflect genuine annotation ambiguity rather than poor emotion understanding. Standard single-label evaluation is therefore insufficient. To address this limitation, we introduce an LLM-as-Judge framework that evaluates each emotion independently according to its plausibility in the conversational context rather than enforcing a single-label decision.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Diffs vs. Whole Files: An Empirical Comparison of Iterative Edit-Based and Direct Generation for Flutter/Dart Code Models
Linear Algebra Foundations of Efficient Attention: A Phase Reversal in Rank Collapse Under SVD Compression
Distilling Vision-Language Models for On-Device Fire Understanding
AGSA-Net: Abundance-Guided Self-Attention Network for Spectral Unmixing-Aware Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification
Closed-Loop Evaluation of Bird's-Eye-View Maps from Cross-View Transformers as Inputs to Behavior-Cloning Policies
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.