arXiv preprint ·
AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models answering questions over multi-page documents are expected to cite the supporting pages, yet supplied citations are sometimes inaccurate, and current evaluations score citations at generation time or against text passages: no existing benchmark evaluates whether a system can verify and correct a page-level citation already attached to an answer. We propose AtomCite, an agentic framework that parses an answer into claims, checks each claim against the image of its cited page, and applies a deterministic repair policy. To evaluate it, we introduce DocCite, to our knowledge the first benchmark for systems that verify and correct page-level citations in document images. Built on MP-DocVQA and DUDE, it combines 928 validated injected instances with 2,468 candidate natural errors harvested from frontier- and efficiency-tier models, of which a two-annotator audit confirms 1,909 as genuine errors. Primary labels are assigned deterministically, not by LLM judges, with the human audit as a separate validation layer. Across three model families (Gemini, Claude, and GPT), AtomCite reaches around 93% binary verification accuracy on the injected benchmark, significantly outperforming every OCR-only condition, including a compute-matched control, and exceeding every prior text-based baseline given the same OCR text. Its repair policy lifts citation precision on the injected mix from a constructed 34% to 87-90% while retaining over 90% of correct claims. AtomCite also transfers: with frozen prompts and zero training, it raises the hallucination-detection scores of two open 7-8B models on five public benchmarks above the same models prompted as direct judges. Finally, the audit shows that noise in automatic labels biases measured verifier accuracy and can reverse system rankings, so evaluations relying only on synthetic or automatic labels risk mismeasuring verification capability.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
EviMap: Evidence-Grounded Hierarchical Topic Maps for Exploring Unlabeled Corpora
SurveyAgent-HKA: A multi-agent framework for scientific survey generation with LLMs and human knowledge augmentation
Measuring GEO Visibility: Prompt Corpora Define the Answer Market
Evaluating Deep-Search Agents under Hierarchical Web Evidence Poisoning
Beyond One-Shot Expansion: Contrastive Evidence Exploration for Multi-Hop Retrieval
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.