arXiv preprint ·
A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Scoring in Large-Scale Writing Assessment
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), into educational assessment has opened new opportunities to enhance the efficiency and scalability of grading processes. This study presents the design and validation of an AI-assisted scoring framework for written responses in a large-scale national assessment. The proposed approach focuses on short written texts of approximately 150-200 words and incorporates a human-in-the-loop strategy to preserve assessment quality while reducing manual workload. The study is grounded in a real operational context, using data from two recent editions of a nationwide test, each comprising approximately 5,000 student responses. We analyze the alignment between AI-generated scores and human raters across multiple rubric dimensions, as well as the impact of the proposed decision flow on pass/fail outcomes. Results show moderate to high agreement between the model and human evaluations in most dimensions, supporting the feasibility of AI assistance in this setting. Moreover, the proposed correction workflow identifies cases where human review is most valuable, enabling a more efficient allocation of expert effort. The findings suggest that AI-assisted scoring can be safely integrated into large-scale assessment processes only when combined with carefully designed human oversight. The paper concludes by discussing practical implications for deployment in national assessment systems and outlining future research directions, including longitudinal monitoring of model-human alignment and the analysis of potential cognitive bias introduced by AI-supported review workflows.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
BIT.UA at BioASQ 14B: Modular Retrieval with pg_textsearch and Qdrant, and Agent-Based Answer Generation
Bait-and-Recover: Poisoning Internal Refusal Signals to Defend LLMs against White-Box Editing Jailbreaks
MoirfEolas and CríochScore: Developing Resources for and the Evaluation of Tokenization Alignment with Irish Morphology
Recall Is Not Protection: Evaluating Safety Monitors Against Model Compliance
Leveraging Low-Level Symbolic Competences for Unsupervised Grounding in Hallucination Detection
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.