arXiv preprint ·
A Comparative Study of Counterfactual Explainers for Graph Neural Networks Enabling Multiple Types of Graph Edit
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Counterfactual explanations for graph-structured data seek to determine minimal and realistic modifications required in an input graph to alter a model's prediction to a predefined output. Although counterfactual explainers that support modifying the graph by both adding and removing edges have recently emerged, there is still a lack of general and efficient methods, especially when considering the quality of the generated explanations. Moreover, the problem remains far from solved, as existing methods exhibit different strengths and weaknesses, often trading off between explanation size, coverage and quality. For this reason, it is important to identify where each method performs well and where it falls short, so as to guide future research in the field. Thus, our study compares six state-of-the-art (SOTA) models on a diverse set of real-world and synthetic datasets, covering both binary and multi-class graph and node classification tasks, and evaluates their performance using diverse quantitative and qualitative metrics.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Beyond Homoscedasticity: Decoupled Uncertainty Optimization for Deep Imbalanced Regression
Nonlinear elliptic homogenization with the parametric Deep Ritz method
Solution-space heterogeneity shapes federated learning dynamics across partial differential equations
Diagonal Attenuation: A Finite-Sample Correction for PCA
Amortizing Scaling Law Construction Costs
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.