arXiv preprint ·
A Structured Debate-Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Complex Clinical Diagnostic Decision Support
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) show potential for medical tasks, but their single-turn question-answer format does not reflect how clinical diagnosis is performed in practice. As a result, they remain limited in complex diagnostic settings. We developed Debate-Mixture-of-Agents (DMoA), a novel multi-agent framework that structures role-based interaction to support iterative diagnostic reasoning. Base models and DMoA were evaluated on 297 rare disease cases and 1,719 challenging cases. Across both datasets, DMoA improved most likely diagnosis accuracy by 10.21 percentage points and safety rate by 11.36 percentage points over GPT-4o baseline. Ablation experiments showed that the gains were not simply due to the use of more models or longer outputs, but also reflected the contribution of the structured workflow. Further analyses examined how framework design, base model choice, and token budget affected performance. DMoA performed better with a 4*2 structure, stronger base models, and a larger token budget. These findings demonstrate the potential of DMoA for clinical tasks and suggest further investigation of multi-agent frameworks.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
BIT.UA at BioASQ 14B: Modular Retrieval with pg_textsearch and Qdrant, and Agent-Based Answer Generation
Bait-and-Recover: Poisoning Internal Refusal Signals to Defend LLMs against White-Box Editing Jailbreaks
MoirfEolas and CríochScore: Developing Resources for and the Evaluation of Tokenization Alignment with Irish Morphology
Recall Is Not Protection: Evaluating Safety Monitors Against Model Compliance
Leveraging Low-Level Symbolic Competences for Unsupervised Grounding in Hallucination Detection
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.